Overall impression: Reviews of St Anthony Park Home are mixed but cluster around several clear strengths and some notable safety and communication concerns. Many reviewers praise the facility for its rehabilitative services, steady and compassionate staff, and strong social programming. However, a subset of reviews report serious lapses in safety, responsiveness, and care consistency that prospective residents or families should investigate further. The sentiment ranges from highly recommended by long-term residents and families to strong warnings from those who experienced or observed neglect.
Rehabilitation and clinical therapy: One of the most consistent positive themes is the facility’s rehabilitation focus. Multiple reviewers highlight excellent physical, occupational, and speech therapy, with rapid patient improvement and successful early discharges attributed to high-quality therapy services. Therapy teams are repeatedly described as outstanding and instrumental in residents’ recovery, which makes St Anthony Park Home a compelling option for short-term rehab after hospitalization.
Staffing, culture, and management: Many reviews emphasize long-tenured staff, kindness, and attentive caregiving. Several people note the owner is accessible, responsive, and that the facility feels non-corporate — attributes that contribute to continuity of care and a personable environment. Leisure and activities programming receives strong praise: daily social activities, well-run events, and a dietitian-led dining program are mentioned as positive contributors to resident quality of life. Veterans’ families also appreciated help navigating VA processes.
Facility condition and dining: The building is described as older but generally well-maintained; some reviewers call it spotlessly clean and well-kept. Dining is noted positively when dietitian involvement is present, and the dining areas are described as spacious. However, several reviewers note the decor is outdated and rooms are plain, which could matter to prospective long-term residents seeking more modern private spaces.
Safety, care consistency, and communication concerns: A significant and recurring set of negative comments centers on safety and inconsistent care. Reported issues include beds lacking rails, residents left at risk of falls, call buttons placed out of reach or left on the floor, and instances where nurses or aides were unresponsive. Other troubling anecdotes include blood draws performed at the dining table while residents were eating, residents left sitting without their walkers nearby, and reports of mistreatment or neglect. Communication problems are also cited — poor staff communication and inadequate patient advocacy — which amplifies the impact of safety lapses. These reports are not universal but are serious enough to be a key pattern across the reviews.
Inconsistency and change over time: Reviews show variability: many families praise cleanliness, responsiveness, and improvement under private ownership, while others say care degraded after a sale or express distrust of management. This inconsistency suggests variable performance across time periods, shifts in staff, or uneven application of policies and training. Some reviewers specifically call out untrained or unfriendly staff and unpleasant environments, in contrast to other accounts of very compassionate care.
Overall recommendation and considerations: The facility has clear strengths in rehabilitation, therapy services, activities, and a number of long-term staff and management practices that families value. At the same time, the reported safety incidents, communication issues, and inconsistency in care quality are substantial concerns. Prospective residents and families should balance the strong therapy and activity offerings against the safety-related reports. Before deciding, visitors should tour the unit(s), ask about current staffing levels and turnover, request recent inspection or complaint histories, inquire about fall-prevention protocols and call-button checks, observe meal and clinical practices (including how blood draws and personal care are handled), and speak directly with therapy staff and the owner/administrator about any recent changes in ownership or staffing. Doing so will help determine whether the positive patterns described in many reviews are present and whether the negative incidents appear to have been addressed.
